That’s a good question, and while we have some answers for you, much of what we can do with it is actually still unknown. We cannot yet provide nutritional estimates using the tool today - that requires a lot of data we are still gathering and from which we are building the necessary algorthms. But we can better understand variation in the spectra so we can calibrate these and future tools faster and cheaper. If that doesn’t excite you, then maybe you should wait a year or so to buy one when we have a “consumer-ready” device. But if you ARE excited to explore with us, then we would propose the following short list of experiments to start off with:
- How much spectral variation is there in foods from different sources?
- How does that spectral variation relate to taste?
- How does that spectral variation relate to variety, soil type, fertility program, epigenetics, microbiome, climatic conditions, age, post harvest conditions, time of year, etc?
These are the basic questions we are focused on answering, and where we hope to start with those who received this first generation version.
Got other ideas? Great! The possibilities are wide open. We've set up forums for the community to discuss their thoughts, discoveries, challenges, and insights.
Together as farmers and consumers, we can take control of our shared nutritional destiny!
Will the meter tell me what food is better for me, or if my growing practices are good?
Not yet, but with your help we expect that soon it will.
Getting these tools into the hands of farm and community partners is helping us understand food variation. Initially, this data will be used for device calibrations, and correlations with our in-lab data. Once those calibrations are complete, it’s likely some, or maybe even all, of the data we’re gathering now will be able to be “back-calibrated” to derive meaningful statistics, but we won’t know for sure until we get there.